Thanks to Hillary Clinton deciding to make war on Donald Trump by linking him to the Alternative Right, implying that the Alternative Right is an ideological enemy so derided that none can survive being linked to it, the Alternative Right is rising in public consciousness.
But what is it? A survey of literature:
“What Is An Alternative Right?” (Amerika, 2012):
As mentioned in other parts of this blog, conservatism is fundamentally consequentialism. This means that it is concerned with the results of actions, not our feelings or judgments of them. From this comes its worship of eternal truths, or things that work because a study of reality shows them to produce optimal results, and from that a study of transcendental beauty and timeless good.
Any alternative right â€” or pressure on the mainstream right â€” that will succeed is going to work outward from these ideas. They are not fences to keep ideas in a chaotic mass, but like the center of a wheel the anchor to which spokes connect, drawing all the sub-ideas together. They are like the root note in a scale to which key and chord harmonize.
“What Is The Alternative Right?” (Amerika, 2016):
This gave birth to the Alternative Right, which is best summarized as â€œright wing views which are not hybridized with the Left like public right-wingers are forced to be,â€ with a few tenets:
Nationalism. This is where the Right has always clashed with the Left: the Left defines nations by politics, where the Right uses the historical definition of related groups of people indigenous to a land. The Left is anti-nationalism because it endorses equality as a means of replacing cultural standards (culture, values, morality, religion, heritage) with an all-encompassing drive to realize the Utopian egalitarian State.
anti-Cathedralism. The traditional Right opposes centralization and the replacement of natural developments with human intentions, which it sees as fallible and linked to evil because of the weakness of most people and any people assembled in groups. The cabal of media, corporate and government interests that is the Cathedral depends on the ideological basis of government for its legitimacy.
some Traditionalism. Tradition is the essence of conservatism: conserve what achieved the best results in the past. It sees the world as a single thing of which there are many interpretations arriving at the same eternal truths. This includes many diverse methods such as chastity, patriarchy, masculinity, transcendentalism, and humility.
Human Biodiversity. When looking at humans in any way, think like nature: biology first, then how you can educate/brainwash (same difference) them, force them to comply with laws and incentives, or otherwise control people. You cannot control people. Heritage is all, not just at the level of race, but ethnicity, class, caste, family and individual.
“What is the Alt-Right?” (Outside In, 2016):
A short definition, that seems to me uncontroversial: The Alt-Right is the populist dissident right.
…For the Alt-Right, generally speaking, fascism is (1) basically a great idea, and (2) a meaningless slur concocted by (((Cultural Marxists))) to be laughed at.
…As a consequence of its essential populism, the Alt-Right is inclined to anti-capitalism, ethno-socialism, grievance politics, and progressive statism.
“What is the Alt Right?” (Daily Caller, 2016):
The alt right is an online movement opposed to political correctness, multiculturalism, feminism and mainstream conservatism. Itâ€™s primarily comprised of young white men. While a large portion of its adherents are white nationalists, not all of the folks tweeting out the hashtag are concerned with enforcing Aryan supremacy. The alt right is an umbrella term which includes multiple ideologies â€” everyone from anarcho-capitalists, neo-monarchists, American nationalists, menâ€™s rights advocates, â€œidentitarians,â€ and even out-and-out neo-Nazis all claim to be apart of the alt right.
“What is the Alt Right?” (Occidental Dissent, 2016):
The Alt-Right is not just a populist or nationalist revolt against Conservatism, Inc. Most of Trumpâ€™s supporters now fully accept our critique of Conservatism, Inc. Few of these people grasp where the Alt-Right is coming from or have even heard of the Alt-Right.
…The Alt-Right has three hallmark characteristics:
1.) Realism â€“ First, the most important characteristic of the Alt-Right is radical realism. By that I mean that Alt-Right is non-ideological and analyses almost every question from the perspective of whether or not it is true.
The Alt-Right has a reputation for â€œracism.â€ Thatâ€™s because the Alt-Right looks at the question of racial equality, demands to see the evidence, and draws the conclusion it is just a bunch of bullshit we are supposed to believe. The Alt-Right looks at places like Detroit, Haiti, sub-Saharan Africa and so on, shrugs its shoulders, and suggests â€œnot really.â€ There isnâ€™t a school district in the United States which has ever demonstrated the existence of racial equality under controlled conditions. The evidence for racial equality is less plausible than Medieval alchemists trying to turn lead into gold…
2.) Identity â€“ Second, the Alt-Rightâ€™s interest in identity is an outgrowth of its radical realism. The Alt-Rightâ€™s analysis of history and biology has led us to the conclusion that human beings ARE NOT primarily individuals. On the contrary, we are tribal beings who invariably divide the world into in-groups and out-groups, and those tribes have always been in a primordial struggle for DOMINANCE.
Liberals tell themselves a cute story about how individuals once exited a â€œState of Natureâ€ and came together to draw up a social contract in which they parted ways with some of their inalienable rights to create â€œsociety.â€ But thatâ€™s not really what happened now is it? The evidence suggests that prehistoric man lived a life that was nothing like this liberal fantasy. There is no evidence either that â€œsocietyâ€ was created as it was said to have been created â€“ like a lawyerâ€™s contract â€“ in the liberal origin myth.
The timeless struggle for DOMINANCE between rival groups is why we have POLITICS.
3.) Iconoclasm â€“ Third, the Alt-Right has a strong Nietzchean streak. Even if many of us have studied Nietzsche at one point in our lives and moved on as we grew older, we still tend to relish creating mischief. We enjoy smashing idols.
In the United States, liberals, progressives, conservatives, and libertarians are all branches of the common liberal family. All these groups want to preserve the fundamental liberal world order even if they disagree on whether â€œlibertyâ€ or â€œequalityâ€ should be given priority and fight viciously with each other. They all share the same blinkered liberal worldview in which more â€œlibertyâ€ or more â€œequalityâ€ is the solution to every problem.
We donâ€™t belong to the liberal family. Weâ€™re see ourselves as something else altogether. This is why, for example, so many of us enjoy trolling because we donâ€™t believe in any of the standard bullshit â€“ for example, nothing is less self-evident to us than the notion that all men are created equal â€“ and political correctness is an irresistible target.
“What’s the alt right? A Primer” (Washington Post, 2016):
Raspail’s vision has been cited frequently at Breitbart News, especially when a major Western leader criticizes anti-immigrant sentiment. “Now, as in the novel, prominent political officials are urging on ever larger waves,” wrote Breitbart’s Julia Hahn in 2015. “Secular and religious leaders hold hands to pressure blue collar citizens to drop their resistance; media elites and celebrities zealously cheer the opportunity that the migrants provide to atone for the alleged sins of the West â€” for the chance to rebalance the wealth and power of the world by allowing poor migrants from failed states to rush in to claim its treasures.”
“The Alternative Right Rises” (Amerika, 2016):
Perhaps the biggest contribution of the alternative right is to mention the real elephant in the room which is the decline and fall of Western Civilization beginning with The Enlightenmentâ„¢ and worsening as its ideas became more mainstreamed. The idea of human equality means that choices can be arbitrary because they are equal, which has the effect of banishing reality from the room. When the assorted fat feminists, minorities, lunatic liberals and apartment plankton millennials vote for Bernie or Hillary, they are unconcerned about the results of that act. They know what they want to be true and that is enough. Voting is wishful thinking. Naturally, with this mentality in place, the West has become unable to respond to reality and chases dreams and illusions instead of looking at hard problems.
Since the mainstream right will not mention these truths, and the Left and its enthusiastically compliant media will not mention them, actual conservatives needed another outlet. The alternative right draws together several groups â€” libertarians, paleoconservatives, white nationalists, New Right, neoreactionary â€” and unites them under the idea that our current way is dead and our conservative opposition will not stop it because it will not mention forbidden truths. As a result, there is great variation between alternative right beliefs. The leftist media and politicians will try to spin the alternative right as having â€œNaziâ€ or â€œneo-Naziâ€ origins, letting one trait speak for all others as usual, as will compliant mainstream â€œcuckservativeâ€ conservatives. Both groups are threatened by this outsider voice that accurately describes what mainstream politics will refuse to address.
“Clinton links Trump to white nationalist ‘alt-right’ movement” (USA Today, 2016):
Hillary Clinton will argue that Donald Trump is helping to spawn a new ideology in America embraced by white nationalists, neo-Nazis and other extremist groups as she takes aim at a movement dubbed the â€œalt-right.â€
â€œHe is taking a hate movement mainstream,â€ Clinton said Wednesday night on CNN in previewing her speech, scheduled for 3 p.m. Eastern. â€œHeâ€™s bringing it to our communities and our country.”
It â€œreminds me of that great saying that Maya Angelou had that when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time. And Donald Trump has shown us who he is, and we ought to believe him,â€ said Clinton.
In many ways the â€œalt-rightâ€ is a rebranding of classic white nationalism for the 21st century. As BuzzFeed described the movement: â€œIn short, itâ€™s white supremacy perfectly tailored for our times: 4chan-esque racist rhetoric combined with a tinge of Silicon Valleyâ€“flavored philosophizing, all riding on the coattails of the Trump boom.â€
The â€œalt-rightâ€ opposes diversity and immigration, arguing that those policies are a form of â€œwhite genocide.â€ It embraces racism, sexism, anti-Muslim bigotry, and anti-Semitism and sees its goal as usurping the traditional conservative movement, which it views as feckless and weak, in favor of a brand of nationalism.
“How Donald Trump’s New Campaign Chief Created an Online Haven for White Nationalists” (Mother Jones, 2016):
Last week, when Donald Trump tapped the chairman of Breitbart Media to lead his campaign, he wasn’t simply turning to a trusted ally and veteran propagandist. By bringing on Stephen Bannon, Trump was signaling a wholehearted embrace of the “alt-right,” a once-motley assemblage of anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, ethno-nationalistic provocateurs who have coalesced behind Trump and curried the GOP nominee’s favor on social media. In short, Trump has embraced the core readership of Breitbart News.
“We’re the platform for the alt-right,” Bannon told me proudly when I interviewed him at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in July. Though disavowed by every other major conservative news outlet, the alt-right has been Bannon’s target audience ever since he took over Breitbart News from its late founder, Andrew Breitbart, four years ago. Under Bannon’s leadership, the site has plunged into the fever swamps of conservatism, cheering white nationalist groups as an “eclectic mix of renegades,” accusing President Barack Obama of importing “more hating Muslims,” and waging an incessant war against the purveyors of “political correctness.”
“Is the Alternative Right Actually White Nationalism In Disguise?” (Amerika, 2016):
[T]he Alternative Right is an alternative to white nationalism as much as the Republicans.
The goal of the Alternative Right is to establish principles by which civilizations thrive, in contrast to the dying principles upon which we base our current time.
These include nationalism, naturally since all other options have failed, but also extend to many other options. In particular, the Alternative Right studies how the the common sense opinion of a population is replaced by that of its professional politicians.
A better way to view the Alternative Right: a recognition that liberal democracy has failed, and a searching for alternatives which are both not oppressive and not prone to decay like liberal democracy.
“Correcting confusion about the alternative right” (Amerika, 2015):
Alternative right in my mind means two things: (1) right-wing (2) in ways that the mainstream will not acknowledge. This means actual conservatives, since mainstream conservatives have always been liberal apologists at least in part, and so have failed to achieve anything over their 200 year long slow retreat. Alternative right as a term is used like the phrase â€œalternative musicâ€ once was, meaning that which the mainstream is not yet ready for but will mine for ideas once its own get too stale.
…It is also a cheap shot. We are the resistance movement to liberalism; we want non-liberalism. In my mind, that means going back to the root and through cultural change, removing individualism and replacing it with self-interest in context of social role. It means nationalism, or one ethnic group per country (send all non Western Europeans back to their homelands). It means having an aristocracy, or people chosen by ability and character rather than obedience to industry, academia and popularity, instead of mob rule. It means a removal of millions of lines of law and their replacement with a few informal principles.
“A Normie’s Guide To the Alt-Right” (Alternative Right, 2016):
[T]he Alt-Right is a movement founded on the need to reject the false political dichotomy that favours an increasingly Leftist and globalist world. But why should we be so opposed to this? The reason is quite simple: Leftist globalism is sick and degenerative, both in demographic and economic terms, and any individual or group that deems itself healthy â€“ or which at least values health â€“ must reject it.
Leftist globalism can only exist thanks to modernity and the power of technology. The more technologically backward or economically underprivileged areas are, the more they are forced to resort to traditional, localist, and hierarchical modes of existence, in order to survive. This is why Leftist globalism only exists in the West. But even with all its advantages, Leftist globalism is degenerative. We see this in the West, where the core populations are failing to reproduce and are thus in the process of being replaced by incomers from societies that are more technologically backward and economically underprivileged.