“Subvert the Dominant Paradigm” on Aristokratia

aristokratia

The ancient gods live with us today. We rank them above all else but the source of reality itself. Right below them, just by a hair, sit those who benefit us all by publishing interesting, varied and insightful information. Among those are Editors including Gwendolyn Taunton who publishes Aristokratia webzine and book series. I have been fortunate to have pieces accepted for past volumes of the print version of Aristokratia, but today I am proud to announce that my latest article, “Subvert the Dominant Paradigm,” has found a home on Aristokratia.

2 Comments

  1. Dominating F. says:

    Dear Brett:

    I would like to know what is your opinion on human sexuality, more specifically on the implications on living a sexually liberated life.
    There’s a dating advice website with a conservative tone and a decent spirit in that it urges men to constantly become a better versions of themselves, and this is at least, healthy to our society.
    They recently touched on a sensible topic:
    ” I can understand how restricting female sexuality can be beneficial when it comes to creating order within a society, but I still find it morally wrong. Females are humans too, and being sexually free, not only legally but also morally, should be a human right. Also, female sexuality is a beautiful thing – why restrict it instead of appreciating it?”

    source: http://www.girlschase.com/content/sexual-freedom

    1. Notice their argument is entirely non sequitur and feelings. There is no agenda to “restrict female sexuality”; conservatives believe that society as a whole should be family-oriented and thus relatively chaste, including males. The only “restriction” is on promiscuity, and that’s not a direct restriction. We simply want the realistic ability to call a slut and a slut and exclude him/her from our social circle for being a degenerate.

Leave a Reply

37 queries. 0.369 seconds