Comments for Amerika: New Right, Conservationist, Traditionalist, Deep Ecology and Conservative Thought

Comment on Reality versus appearances by RiverC

RiverC — Wed, 22 May 2013 20:02:47 +0000

He visited Britain today. I heard he called God ‘great’ – I guess it’s true what they say, “Even the demons believe, and tremble.”

Comment on Reality versus appearances by 03-04

03-04 — Wed, 22 May 2013 19:16:13 +0000

It’s the devil himself. Is he here to cleanse the earth – or to destroy it?

Comment on Reality versus appearances by NotTheDude

NotTheDude — Wed, 22 May 2013 19:03:02 +0000

I thought that it was showing the products of Amerikan society. Fast food chains and folk who sport hairstyles because it expresses their ridiculous selfhood in a society that is meant to tolerate all no matter how weird and wrong. And maybe just for laughs too!

Comment on Reality versus appearances by RiverC

RiverC — Wed, 22 May 2013 18:39:18 +0000

Old Scratch is back – Business Casual.

Comment on Reality versus appearances by crow

crow — Wed, 22 May 2013 18:25:41 +0000

What meaning did you assign to this one?
I can almost hear him saying:
“Wot yoo lookin’ at me for man? You gotta problem wiv me ‘orns, liek?”

Comment on Reality versus appearances by NotTheDude

NotTheDude — Wed, 22 May 2013 18:10:09 +0000

I just have to say that even though I know the photos put with each post have an intended meaning that I understand, they still make me laugh from time to time. I burst out laughing when I saw this one! Thanks!

Comment on Reality versus appearances by crow

crow — Wed, 22 May 2013 16:44:59 +0000

Velkommen, Soren.
A pleasant surprise to see you here :)
I’ve often thought what Amerika needed most was some Vikings.

Comment on Reality versus appearances by Anon

Anon — Wed, 22 May 2013 11:36:59 +0000

Succinct (considering the weighty topics addressed) summary of what this site is all about and what Mr. Stevens and others have been saying here for years. Nice to see it from a (is ‘slightly’ a fair adjective, here?) different perspective; it’s a reminder that even though at times (such as the 2012 U.S. election period) the focus and application of a lot of these ideas are US-centric, there is always a lesson in them for almost anyone alive today.

You cannot really claim to to be opposed to the current dominant trends today, whichever modern state you find yourself in, and not have these ideas resonate with you. In a way, this is both disheartening in that the disease is everywhere, inescapable (as pointed out in this article), but also a positive point – it means that those who oppose it and wish to see a return to saner times have, essentially, a common enemy and can work together, where possible, to defeat it.

Comment on Friedrich II. von Hohenstaufen by crow

crow — Wed, 22 May 2013 03:15:15 +0000

In English, Norman refers to Medieval French, or of Northern France.

Comment on How conservatives differ from liberals by Vigilance

Vigilance — Tue, 21 May 2013 16:34:30 +0000

No worries friend. I had assumed this was the case.

In regards to the corrupting effect of corrupt institutions:
In my experience, leftists tend to view humans as deterministic entities. The choice to remain virtuous is never wholly considered in their analysis. Thus the mantra “power corrupts.” I think that the truth is the opposite “The corrupt seek power.”