Comments for Amerika: New Right, Conservationist, Traditionalist, Deep Ecology and Conservative Thought http://www.amerika.org New Right, Conservationist, Traditionalist, Deep Ecology and Conservative Thought: Conservation Conservatism (Crunchy Paleoconservatism) Wed, 23 May 2012 00:07:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 Comment on NATO by Ryan http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19798 Ryan Wed, 23 May 2012 00:07:49 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19798 "but amusingly they are developing in Russian and China, to the exclusion of everyone else" that is arguable though, white russians (rus), are being outbred by turkic peoples (uzbeks, tatars, chechens,kazaks,etc) and the chinese are merely supporting Han nationalism, and suppressing Ughur and tibetan nationalism (in fact they are genocidally race replacing them). also the eurasian union is a globalist system, it is not "traditional", it is in the same sense bad for the common russian and the common chinamen, who now will have their production controlled from even higher up, trans-nationally. to perhaps give a counter point to your critique of the new right, alt-right, etc. the progression of egalitarianism to prominece occured with a lot of book writing, alot of intellectual masterbation went on behind the scenes in russia in the 1830s and this led to emancipation as well as the growth of socialist ideals later. ideas are extremely powerful and fostering the idea of the "ethnostate" is necessary to eventually making one. but yes Meow Mix i too am suffering from the seemly pointlessness of this isolated pocket of authors. “but amusingly they are developing in Russian and China, to the exclusion of everyone else”
that is arguable though, white russians (rus), are being outbred by turkic peoples (uzbeks, tatars, chechens,kazaks,etc) and the chinese are merely supporting Han nationalism, and suppressing Ughur and tibetan nationalism (in fact they are genocidally race replacing them). also the eurasian union is a globalist system, it is not “traditional”, it is in the same sense bad for the common russian and the common chinamen, who now will have their production controlled from even higher up, trans-nationally.
to perhaps give a counter point to your critique of the new right, alt-right, etc. the progression of egalitarianism to prominece occured with a lot of book writing, alot of intellectual masterbation went on behind the scenes in russia in the 1830s and this led to emancipation as well as the growth of socialist ideals later. ideas are extremely powerful and fostering the idea of the “ethnostate” is necessary to eventually making one. but yes Meow Mix i too am suffering from the seemly pointlessness of this isolated pocket of authors.

]]> Comment on NATO by Meow Mix http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19797 Meow Mix Tue, 22 May 2012 23:34:05 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19797 Thank you for writing this Brett, it's about time someone pointed this out to the so-called New Right. I like the idea of the New Right, but I hate their methods: introverted weirdos writing crappy books that barely hide their nazi content, starting blogs about how national bolshevism is the answer and the Eurasian empire will save the day, all the while finding reasons to continue hating USA and Israel (their only hope). Hell, most of them are anti-capitalist and rail on about the 'plutocratic elites', as if they were stealing a script from OWS. This gives them a convenient reason to do nothing. Instead of uniting behind their national conservative parties (Republicans, etc) and making real votes mean something, they dismiss the mainstream as unradical and go back to their basements and jerk it to Hitler (who they claim to denounce). Russia is already developing the Eurasian Union and China is flexing it's muscle while the US shrinks it's forces and the European Union crumbles. It is amusing and sobering, if nothing else. To think that everyone laughed at Mitt Romney for his warnings on Russia. Intellectuals screamed for disarmament after WWI and it smacked them in the face. They've kept doing it ever since, as though drawing down forces will suddenly bring world peace and compromise. Nationalism and traditionalism are returning to the world, but amusingly they are developing in Russian and China, to the exclusion of everyone else. Thank you for writing this Brett, it’s about time someone pointed this out to the so-called New Right. I like the idea of the New Right, but I hate their methods: introverted weirdos writing crappy books that barely hide their nazi content, starting blogs about how national bolshevism is the answer and the Eurasian empire will save the day, all the while finding reasons to continue hating USA and Israel (their only hope). Hell, most of them are anti-capitalist and rail on about the ‘plutocratic elites’, as if they were stealing a script from OWS. This gives them a convenient reason to do nothing. Instead of uniting behind their national conservative parties (Republicans, etc) and making real votes mean something, they dismiss the mainstream as unradical and go back to their basements and jerk it to Hitler (who they claim to denounce).

Russia is already developing the Eurasian Union and China is flexing it’s muscle while the US shrinks it’s forces and the European Union crumbles. It is amusing and sobering, if nothing else. To think that everyone laughed at Mitt Romney for his warnings on Russia. Intellectuals screamed for disarmament after WWI and it smacked them in the face. They’ve kept doing it ever since, as though drawing down forces will suddenly bring world peace and compromise. Nationalism and traditionalism are returning to the world, but amusingly they are developing in Russian and China, to the exclusion of everyone else.

]]> Comment on NATO by Ryan http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19796 Ryan Tue, 22 May 2012 18:51:46 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19796 but that was not really a lasting empire, it immediately, like attila's, divided up upon ghengis' death. kubai's was immense for sure, but it did not take over cultures and assimilate them, the mongols only had it for a short time. also the white slav people took the siberian frontier from the asiatic people, they have had it for around 500 years, ultimately for russia it come down to whether they are gonna be asian or european, the current rus nation is european, so i feel that unless there is some serious khazarian puppeteering going on, the russians will be on the "yt" side, which would develop regardless of the pro-zionist NATO, which has lost almost all legitimacy in the eyes of europe and the US 9outside of neo-"con-dom") but that was not really a lasting empire, it immediately, like attila’s, divided up upon ghengis’ death. kubai’s was immense for sure, but it did not take over cultures and assimilate them, the mongols only had it for a short time. also the white slav people took the siberian frontier from the asiatic people, they have had it for around 500 years, ultimately for russia it come down to whether they are gonna be asian or european, the current rus nation is european, so i feel that unless there is some serious khazarian puppeteering going on, the russians will be on the “yt” side, which would develop regardless of the pro-zionist NATO, which has lost almost all legitimacy in the eyes of europe and the US 9outside of neo-”con-dom”)

]]> Comment on NATO by EvilBuzzard http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19795 EvilBuzzard Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:08 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19795 >>>>Only one can rule the Eurosiberian landmass: Europe, Eurasia or Asia. Outside of GHengis Khan, who ever came close? Trajan, Alexander and Abu-Bakr are the only two I can think of who even got in Ghengis Khan's Zip Code. Even they were several million square miles short of winning the Big Risk Game. >>>>Only one can rule the Eurosiberian landmass: Europe, Eurasia or Asia.

Outside of GHengis Khan, who ever came close? Trajan, Alexander and Abu-Bakr are the only two I can think of who even got in Ghengis Khan’s Zip Code. Even they were several million square miles short of winning the Big Risk Game.

]]> Comment on NATO by Ryan http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19793 Ryan Tue, 22 May 2012 16:01:03 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19793 china is quite similar to japan, both of whom are emulating the west, similar to a cancer cell. the japs started sooner and tried to push YT out of the pacific, the aussies being existentially threatened by the screaming yellow swordsmen. but unlike japan central authority has been hard to maintain in china. today china has a large male excess, which is good for war, but large military populations are doulbe egded swords. china had many things to overcome, especially as it is culturally emulating the "west" (read egalitarian freudo-marxist anti-culture). the communist styles of deng xiaoping are not even remotely communist, merely authoritarian. now thee chinese are renowned for their ability for devolution. this is opinion, but it think china is going to play out similar to japan in the 90's, especially once the mass of consumer exports to 'merica dies down. then the ol' chinese game of tearing it all apart will start. china is quite similar to japan, both of whom are emulating the west, similar to a cancer cell. the japs started sooner and tried to push YT out of the pacific, the aussies being existentially threatened by the screaming yellow swordsmen. but unlike japan central authority has been hard to maintain in china. today china has a large male excess, which is good for war, but large military populations are doulbe egded swords. china had many things to overcome, especially as it is culturally emulating the “west” (read egalitarian freudo-marxist anti-culture). the communist styles of deng xiaoping are not even remotely communist, merely authoritarian. now thee chinese are renowned for their ability for devolution. this is opinion, but it think china is going to play out similar to japan in the 90′s, especially once the mass of consumer exports to ‘merica dies down. then the ol’ chinese game of tearing it all apart will start.

]]> Comment on NATO by Ryan http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19792 Ryan Tue, 22 May 2012 15:52:40 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19792 "khazars" “khazars”

]]> Comment on NATO by 1349 http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19791 1349 Tue, 22 May 2012 11:38:13 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19791 <blockquote>Only one can rule the Eurosiberian landmass: Europe, Eurasia or Asia.</blockquote> Who rules it today?

Only one can rule the Eurosiberian landmass: Europe, Eurasia or Asia.

Who rules it today?

]]> Comment on NATO by 1349 http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19790 1349 Tue, 22 May 2012 11:37:10 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19790 Are guns & rockets efficient weapons if compared to porn, "childfree" propaganda, LGBT propaganda, alcohol, drugs, genetic assimilation and language assimilation? In 20 years, will NATO have any West Europeans to defend or Russians to fight? Only if we start a war TODAY to wake our rightwing instincts of survival. =) Are guns & rockets efficient weapons if compared to porn, “childfree” propaganda, LGBT propaganda, alcohol, drugs, genetic assimilation and language assimilation?
In 20 years, will NATO have any West Europeans to defend or Russians to fight?
Only if we start a war TODAY to wake our rightwing instincts of survival. =)

]]> Comment on NATO by Avery http://www.amerika.org/politics/nato/comment-page-1/#comment-19789 Avery Tue, 22 May 2012 09:36:25 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16083#comment-19789 The most bizarre thing is protesting NATO... for peace. Don't they realize that NATO is one of the most effective organizations at guaranteeing peace? What do they think peace is? The most bizarre thing is protesting NATO… for peace. Don’t they realize that NATO is one of the most effective organizations at guaranteeing peace? What do they think peace is?

]]> Comment on Free speech (for the dumb) by Izak http://www.amerika.org/politics/free-speech-for-the-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-19788 Izak Tue, 22 May 2012 08:00:50 +0000 http://www.amerika.org/?p=16035#comment-19788 Nice Discharge reference. Nice Discharge reference.

]]>