Also, your entire argument rests on your, very repeated, ‘do the right thing’.
You must define what is ‘right’, why it is ‘right’ and why one needs to do the ‘right’ thing in the 1st place.
Only when these are answered would you know what actions lead to evil. Evil, defined as that which opposes man’s life.

Anything else is just collective mentality and socialism. And we all know where that leads to.

It’s people with completely rediculous, biased, racist, and demeaning (and please look over some grammar rules on correct usage of commas before your next article gets posted “class war and IQ, the psychology of liberalism, biological determinism”) opinions such as yours that cause all the problems in the world. Please, PLEASE, read through your “fancy piece of jibberish” (and i censored that for your benefit) and please tell me you cant honesly believe it to be the truth. This is degrading on so many levels. i dont even understand how someone can stoop to the level to say something like this, but as Voltaire says “i do not agree with what you have to say, but i’ll defend to the death your right to say it”

HOWEVER:

We should be encouraging networks and the media not to censor these things but show alternatives. There’s market for everything, that much has been proven with reality shows about everything under the sun. Show a series about a compelling enough fat chick going through high school and I think lots of people would watch it and it might even be hailed for it’s “honesty”. Banning morally questionable entertainment is not the answer, and anyway if we’re going down that path let’s talk about the violence. We get so uptight about a pair of bare breasts being shown on the tv screen or teens getting themselves in compromising positions but what about the bloody gunshot wounds seen in every cop show or Jack Bouer (sorry if I spelled it wrong, never actually watched the show) torturing terrorists for information? Again, I don’t support censorship but I find it irritating that whenever it’s brought up it’s usually in reference to the sensuality of love scenes or nearly nude young women prancing about in most late-night soap operas.

Here in Britain, I support the BNP, but that has a real difficulty in the fact that we already have a huge mix up of different groups – A more acceptable approach, a closer step would be to strengthen each group with an idea, I don’t care who comes or goes as long as they make this land better for the future. Whatever group is dedicated enough, strong enough to take responsibility for the land beneath their feet – then it is theres for the taking, naturally. Whoever just thinks they have the ‘right’ to the land they stand on without any respect for its ecosystems or future simply does not deserve it – not that they can keep it anyway.

Change is constant, whatever group can take responsibility for itself and overcomes itself shall take the treasure for itself – whichever blames others and fights over meaningless things gets nothing. Those who take responsibility will have the nation for their groups, they will create new cultures and new symmetry between peoples.

The ground beneath our feet – look after it and it will look after you – it doesn’t care about who or what you look like, what you do, as long as you don’t destroy the vibrance of the life therein, but instead enhance – increase and make it stronger, more meaningful. Each locality needs a challenge – whoever can enhance it and add more meaning into life then is able to capture it and can make it their home – Whoever treats their locality like trash, spits on it, doesn’t give a damn will then get all these problems we face and its their own fault. It’s the fault of the individuals for voting idiots in who destroyed their own groups, for being irresponsible, and if they get overrun its their own fault.

It’s now a dumbed down game of one-upmanship, except one side is winning, but only by outlawing language it doesn’t like.

One crowd, if it isn’t jailed or fined because it is incapable of staying in power, screams slurs like jungle bunny or wetback; the opposing crowd variously shouts random selections of hater, meany, nazi, bad-person, and blacks on blondes for spite.

What each crowd maintains in common is that 1) they’re still equally useless in that anyone can use purely emotive language 2) neither yet indicates in what way their own side is right because they give us no actual content we can evaluate.

I think the answer here is to think outside this monkey cage box and return to what always prevails which is quality and truth and their various genteel outer forms. That doesn’t mean we can’t use forceful and judgemental language or that we are lacking in empathy.

The meaning remains, but it is better tailored to fit people who primarily think and confront problems rather than those who primarily gesticulate and avoid solutions.

also, Steve, great observation that emotional outbursts tend to derail thoughtful debate. you must be able to step outside your own perspective to be open to others. as an aspie myself this is difficult, and probably why i identify with and warm to the obsessively-structured nature of what the authors here advocate even though i myself am a libertarian. our nexus here is the absolutism and the dislike of ambiguity and missing links in logic chains.

anyway, shine on you crazy fascists, and speak your piece, whatever it may be. if nothing else, you are bold and insightful, and everyone can benefit from that.

can’t wait to read the “paleocon/hippie nexus”, as i (as a hippie at heart) have been observing this too, and indeed it’s what attracted me to the Old Right (not neocon or religious) resurgence. i have a feeling you’re gonna nail it, and me. it’s comforting to be understood.

This behaviour doesn’t fix the root problem though; the problem being recurrent moral weakness. Instead, it encourages cycles of degenerate behaviour, and breeds frustration when you realise you can’t control everything all of the time (an attitude that people with social disabilities suffer from).

I believe we should let the people do what they want, and judge them accordingly. Ban slutty TV if you want, but do it in your own home.

I hope that I am seeing Corrupt.org (or rather, Alex) evolve past this strain of aspie-fascism.