Comments on: Welcome to Oligarchy

By: highduke

highduke — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:57:17 +0000

Actually, a lot of on-going behind-the-scenes activity you’re totally oblivious about leads me to conclude that I’m being taken seriously & if you’re dumb enough to think that Alex’s article ‘made fun of me’ than you’re the kind of naive, banal dumbass who obviously can’t read between the lines & takes the lamest presentations at face value.

By: PaulBaptist

PaulBaptist — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:48:25 +0000

Wait, aren’t you the person that Alex made fun of some time ago?

I think it’s this article: http://www.corrupt.org/news/the_collected_wit_and_wisdom_of_highduke

Hmm, after reading that, how could anyone take you seriously?

By: highduke

highduke — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:54:11 +0000

Ouch! In YO’ face, jeff from PGH! If there was anything to criticize on Amerika.org, I’d be bringing it up. Its quality is near perfect in terms of sourcing & POV but the layout sucks compared to CORRUPT.ORG, where the sourcing & POV are laughable & it’s a shame such an inconsistent, directionless blog has such an attractive layout. Typical of Alex Birch: all form, no substance. Alex wasn’t like that when Brett Stevens used to write for CORRUPT until Alex disregarded his ethics & intellect. Sad

By: Doug Vance

Doug Vance — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:58:20 +0000

“Fine for no health care” is now buried at mainstream news sites, but Google has links to them cached at the moment.
http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Thomas+Barthold

Financing the Senator, and later President:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/soros_obama_and_the_millionair.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/us/politics/03obama.html?pagewanted=2

Record of stakes in investments speak for themselves.

By: jeff from PGH

jeff from PGH — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:25:05 +0000

This article is awful.

Come on, naturalnews? La Rouche PAC?

While this blog has typically interesting perspectives, this “article” is just spreading around unsubstantiated information from non-credible sources.

Brett Stevens would never approve of this.

By: Doug Vance

Doug Vance — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:20:26 +0000

An ideal state would orient itself on the natural ecology within its bounds and the traditional inhabitants therein. That’s also called stewardship, which is the entire purpose of having a state in the first place.

But, our liberal states today are oriented around participation within a framework of ideals, usually a constitution. That inserts an intangible middle layer, subject to variable interpretations/amendments, between the state and its land/people.

In other words, whoever is in charge at the moment has the ability, using this framework of abstractions, to radically alter the relationship between the state and its land/people, for whatever ends.

By: highduke

highduke — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:01:08 +0000

This is why The State, as a protector of the founding culture & ethnicity, should own big corporations while keeping around a handful of Jewish & gentile Oligarchs as scapegoats during recessions: Soros should be caged & tried like Khodorkovsky while Buffett should have pens thrown at him by the president on national television like Oleg Deripaska & be forced to raise wages. That’s PUTINISM.